It is currently Wed 09 Sep 2026 1:43 pm

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu 30 Aug 2012 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun 12 Aug 2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Florida, USA
Redwolf wrote:
scw1217 wrote:
Thanks, everyone. Any thoughts on: Faith & Forgiveness. Faith in the sense of belief. quote]

If by 'faith' you mean "belief," it would be "Creideamh & Maithiúnas"

As for the quote from John...yes, it's the thief he's comparing himself to. My point was that the emphatic form "mise" is used in the second part of that verse because of the comparison...if you're only using the second half, the emphatic probably isn't necessary, so you could go with "mé" instead.

Redwolf


Ah, gotcha. Thanks!

_________________
Suzanne D. Williams is a native Floridian, wife, and mother with a penchant for spelling things and an Irishman somewhere way back in her background.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 30 Aug 2012 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 6:15 pm
Posts: 3594
Location: An Astráil
Redwolf wrote:
scw1217 wrote:
Thanks, everyone. Any thoughts on: Faith & Forgiveness. Faith in the sense of belief. quote]

If by 'faith' you mean "belief," it would be "Creideamh & Maithiúnas"

As for the quote from John...yes, it's the thief he's comparing himself to. My point was that the emphatic form "mise" is used in the second part of that verse because of the comparison...if you're only using the second half, the emphatic probably isn't necessary, so you could go with "mé" instead.

Redwolf

I think a quote should stay the same even if removed from the original context, otherwise it becomes a paraphrase. The emphatic/contrastive won't be out of place here.

I can second:

Tháinig mise chun go mbeadh an bheatha acu agus go mbeadh sí acu go fial. (Though An Lon Dubh's contribution Thánag-sa ionnus go mbeadh an bheatha acu, agus go mbeadh sí acu níos iomadúla. is fine if you want a Munster version.)

And also second:

Beatha & Fuascailt "Life & Deliverance" (though I think we've used fuascailt for "redemption" in your other title?)

Creideamh & Maithiúnas "Faith & Forgiveness"

Await further confirmation or correction ...

_________________
Múinteoir Gaeilge - Irish Teacher
My "specialty" is Connemara Irish, particularly Cois Fhairrge dialect, but I can also speak Ulster and Munster Irish with native-level pronunciation.
Is fearr Gaeilge ḃriste ná Béarla cliste, cinnte, aċ i ḃfad níos fearr aríst í Gaeilge ḃinn ḃeo na nGaeltaċtaí.
Gaeilge Chonnacht (GC), go háraid Gaeilge Chois Fhairrge (GCF), Gaeilic Uladh (GU), Gaelainn na Mumhan (GM), agus Gaeilge an Chaighdeáin Oifigiúil (CO).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 30 Aug 2012 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun 12 Aug 2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Florida, USA
Yes, you used it in the other title. That was Life & Redemption. Interesting that it's the same word. I'm not sure if that's good or bad. I'm afraid I don't know the different in Munster and the other. (Don't throw stones at me.) :D

_________________
Suzanne D. Williams is a native Floridian, wife, and mother with a penchant for spelling things and an Irishman somewhere way back in her background.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1527
scw1217 wrote:
Yes, you used it in the other title. That was Life & Redemption. Interesting that it's the same word. I'm not sure if that's good or bad. I'm afraid I don't know the different in Munster and the other. (Don't throw stones at me.) :D


:) , there will be no stones thrown here. Munster Irish is one of the three dialects still alive to this day. The others being Connacht and Ulster Irish. The Leinster dialect became extinct sometime in the 1920s-1930s. The dialects differ in areas such as pronounciation, idioms and vocabulary.

The three main dialects break down further into sub- dialects. In general people who speak a dialect can understand each other, but there can be difficulties where certain words mean something else in different dialects. This occurs on a sub- dialect level also. There is of course an Official Standard or "Caighdeán Oifigiúil". Unlike most standards, like Catellan Spanish, the Official Standard is an artificial language that combines the three dialects of Irish with inclusions that rely heavily on Connacht Irish as it seen as the bridge between Ulster and Munster Irish.

It is important to point out that the Official Standard is not the language of any native speaker. It relies heavily on English translations, idioms and terminology and is generally disliked by native speakers. Most learning material and modern translations are given in the Official Standard.

The Munster translation given by Lon Dubh is from father Peadar Ua Laoghaire, who himself was a native speaker of Cork (Munster Irish) and whose writings are seen by many as the backbone of the early Gaelic revival. Ua Laoghaire wrote extensively in Cork Irish on religious and secular matters. His writings are seen by many as an exemplar to anyone wishing to study Cork Irish. His translation above would have been carried out in the late 1800s or early 1900s.

_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)

Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice


I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:54 pm
Posts: 3444
Location: Cill Dara
An Cionnfhaolach wrote:
there will be no stones thrown here.
bricks, blocks, hurleys, baseball bats, but definitely no stones....! :twisted:

_________________
Is foghlaimeoir mé. I am a learner. DEFINITELY wait for others to confirm and/or improve.
Beatha teanga í a labhairt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1527
Saoirse wrote:
An Cionnfhaolach wrote:
there will be no stones thrown here.
bricks, blocks, hurleys, baseball bats, but definitely no stones....! :twisted:


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: , well, maybe by Lughaidh :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)

Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice


I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)


Last edited by An Cionnfhaolach on Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 18 Nov 2011 2:27 pm
Posts: 622
Let he who is without grammatical error cast the first stone.

_________________
Táim ag foghlaim fós. Fáilte roimh gach aon cheartúchán.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1527
Mick wrote:
Let he who is without grammatical error cast the first stone.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)

Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice


I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 5:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1527
"Tháinig mise chun go mbeadh an bheatha acu agus go mbeadh sí acu go fial".

I came in order (so that) that they would have their life and that they may have it in abundance.


"Thánag-sa ionnus go mbeadh an bheatha acu, agus go mbeadh sí acu níos iomadúla". (Munster version)

I came in order that they would have life, and they would have it more often (in abundance).

As you can see there is no real difference just different wording and grammatical form. I would prefer the Munster one, but my opinion is bias :D because I speak Munster Irish. I would just as much be happy with the first one. If you go with the Munster one the spelling would have to be altered a small bit because it is "réamhchaighdeánach" spelling (or the spelling before the introduction of the official Standard). "Iomdha" was the Déise way of expressing "iomaí" as seen in the works of Amhlaoibh Ó Suilleabháin. But iomaí is now used thanks in part to the Caighdeán.

"ionnus" is writen as "ionas" today and a question on "iomadúla" is that recognised by the Caighdeán? or will "iomaí" have to be used- either way I vote it should be kept "iomadúla".

_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)

Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice


I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 31 Aug 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun 12 Aug 2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Florida, USA
An Cionnfhaolach wrote:
"Tháinig mise chun go mbeadh an bheatha acu agus go mbeadh sí acu go fial".

I came in order (so that) that they would have their life and that they may have it in abundance.


"Thánag-sa ionnus go mbeadh an bheatha acu, agus go mbeadh sí acu níos iomadúla". (Munster version)

I came in order that they would have life, and they would have it more often (in abundance).

As you can see there is no real difference just different wording and grammatical form. I would prefer the Munster one, but my opinion is bias :D because I speak Munster Irish. I would just as much be happy with the first one. If you go with the Munster one the spelling would have to be altered a small bit because it is "réamhchaighdeánach" spelling (or the spelling before the introduction of the official Standard). "Iomdha" was the Déise way of expressing "iomaí" as seen in the works of Amhlaoibh Ó Suilleabháin. But iomaí is now used thanks in part to the Caighdeán.

"ionnus" is writen as "ionas" today and a question on "iomadúla" is that recognised by the Caighdeán? or will "iomaí" have to be used- either way I vote it should be kept "iomadúla".


LOL @ all the "stone throwing".

On a serious note, thanks for this. I do see the difference, though I admit I can't read a word of it. Let me ask you this, would one dialect be more common than another around the year 1870. My story involves the son of an immigrant. He would have picked up what he knows from his mother and perhaps it was garbled in with other Gaelic speakers he grew up around.

_________________
Suzanne D. Williams is a native Floridian, wife, and mother with a penchant for spelling things and an Irishman somewhere way back in her background.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Séamus O'Neill and 1847 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group